Einstein was right even when wrong

LONDON                   MEANWHILEBy Simon Singh


We have now entered what is being celebrated as the Einstein Year, marking the centenary of the physicist's annus mirabilis in 1905, when he published three landmark papers – those that proved the existence of atom, showed the validity of quantum physics and of course, introduced the world to his theory of special relativity. Not bad for a beginner

 "It's not that I'm so smart," Albert Einstein once said, "It's just that I stay with problems longer." Whatever the reason for his greatness, there is no doubt that this determination allowed him to invent courageous new physics and explore realms that nobody else had dared to investigate.

 What he was not, however, was a perfect genius. In fact, when it came to the biggest scientific issue of all - the origin of the universe – he was utterly wrong. And while we should certainly laud his achievements over the next 12 months, we may learn a more valuable lesson by investigating Einstein's greatest failure.

 The story starts in the late 19th century, when the scientific establishment believed in an eternal and unchanging universe. This was a neat theory of cosmology, because a universe that had always existed did not raise any awkward questions, such as "When was the universe created?" and "What(or Who)created it?"

 Einstein grew up in this era, and was similarly convinced that the universe had existed for an eternity. However, when he developed general relativity (his theory of gravity) in 1915, he became aware of a tricky problem. Gravity is an attractive force – it attracts coins to the grand and it attracts comets toward the sun. So why hadn't gravity caused the matter in the universe to collapse inward on itself?

 Gravity seemed to be incompatible with an eternal, unchanging universe, and Einstein certainly had no sympathy for the alternative view of a collapsing universe, starting that: "To admit such a possibility seems senseless."

 Isaac Newton had run into the same problem with his own theory of gravity 250 years earlier. He, too, believed in an eternal universe, yet he knew that gravity would have to cause its collapse after a finite time. His solution was to propose that God was responsible for keeping apart all the celestial objects, adjusting their positions from time to time as part of his cosmic curatorial responsibilities.

 Einstein was reluctant to invoke God, so his solution was to fiddle with his theory of general relativity, adding an antigravity force alongside familiar gravity. There was no evidence for this antigravity force, but Einstein assumed that it had to exist in order to provide a platform for eternity.

 Although every now seemed to make sense, there were some dissenters. A small band of renegade cosmologists suggested in the 1920s that the universe was not eternal but had been created at a finite moment in the past.

They claimed it had exploded and expanded from a small, hot, dense state into what we see today, In particular, they argued that it had once been compacted into a primeval super atom, which had them ruptured and exploded. This model, which has since developed into the Big Bang theory, did not require any stabilizing antigravity.

 The Big Bang model was initially ridiculed by the scientific establishment. One of its pioneered, Georges Lemaitre, was both a cosmologist and an ordained priest, so critics suspected that the model was Lwmaitres way of sneaking a Creator into science. While Einstein was not biased against Lemaiter's religious background, he did call the priest's physics "abominable." It was enough to banish the Big Bang model to the hinterlands of cosmology.

 However, in 1929 Einstein was forced to eat humble pie.

Edwin Hubble, working at Mount Wilson Observatory in Southern California, showed that all the distant galaxies in the universe were racing away from one another as though they were debris from a cosmic explosion.

 The Big Bang model seemed to be correct. And While it would take several decades before the theory was accepted by the scientific establishment, Einstein, to his credit, did not fight on. "This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened," he said, and even called his repulsive force the biggest blunder of his career.

In 1931, Einstein paid a visit to Hubble at Mount Wilson, where he renounced his own static cosmology and endorsed the expanding universe model

It might seem that Einstein emerges form this story as a flawed genies, one who was not perfect. In fact, there is a twist to the tale, one that implies he was perhaps better than perfect. If gravity pulls everything together, then the expansion of the Big Bang should be slowing, because all the receding galaxies would be attracted to one another. In 1998, however, when astronomers tried to measure this deceleration, they were astonished to find that the universe is in fact accelerating. The galaxies are apparently moving apart faster and faster as time passes.

 What is the best explanation scientists can come up with? The existence of an antigravity fore. Theorists call this repulsive effect "dark energy," but it is exactly the sort of force that Einstein posited. It seems that even when Einstein thought he was wrong, he turned out to be right.

 And, as we celebrate the Einstein Year, Let's also bear in mind the fact that he was prepared to admit that he was wrong. Perhaps humility, more than anything, is the mark of true genius.

 Simon Sing is the author of "Fermats Enigma" and the forthcoming "Big Bang: The Origins of the Universe."


SEO [PR] おまとめローン 冷え性対策 坂本龍馬 動画掲示板 レンタルサーバー SEO